🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined a collective professional network test this week after viral posts indicated that switching their profile gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system prioritizes men who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which content appear to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with comparable "assertive" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after one week, stating "Every day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants experienced favorable results. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in informal experiments where the same posts by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."